Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3AF8778D.B147D3D3@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 08 May 2001 23:47:41 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: DJGPP 2.04 release date
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010508103030 DOT 3965O-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 7 May 2001, Richard Dawe wrote:
>
> > * snprintf(), vsnprintf();
> > * /dev/zero, /dev/full (still waiting for paperwork from my employer -
> > <sigh>).
> 
> snprintf is close to being finished, if only Someone (tm) addresses my
> concerns about n == 0 etc.

I'm going to have another look at snprintf() soon, when time permits.

> /dev/full and /dev/zero would be good to have, but I don't see this as
> a must, in case you legal trouble isn't solved.

I'll pester my boss again. I'd really like to commit that patch.

> > What else is there?
> 
> You want a shopping list? ;-)

8)

>   - mkdoc changes (or did we already commit them?)

The mkdoc changes haven't been checked in AFAIK. I think the discussion
got lost amongst a flurry of mails. From what I remember I had modified it
to everything that was suggested, apart from being able to define
arbitrary portability targets in the texinfo.

If the mkdoc changes are OK, then I can commit them. (Unless I need the
paperwork to commit that too.)

> In addition, I have a wish list of enhancements that are hard to
> explain in one punch line; if someone wants to hear, I will post their
> descriptions.

If it's not too much hassle, I'd like to hear those too. It might be
useful to have them archive on djgpp-workers too, so you can just point
people at this thread.

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe
http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/

- Raw text -