Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3AF87321.E31CEABC@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 08 May 2001 23:28:49 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: fil40s-beta2
References:	<200105081648 DOT SAA26783 AT mother DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> I get:
> 
> config.cache:ac_cv_func_lstat=${ac_cv_func_lstat=yes}
> config.cache:jm_cv_func_lstat_empty_string_bug=${jm_cv_func_lstat_empty_string_bug=no}
> config.h:/* Define if you have the LSTAT_EMPTY_STRING_BUG function.  */
> config.h:/* #undef HAVE_LSTAT_EMPTY_STRING_BUG */
> config.h:/* Define if you have the lstat function.  */
> config.h:#define HAVE_LSTAT 1
> 
> I've noticed that I'm running bash 2.03 and you 2.04. Can this be the
> problem?

<Slaps forehead> I forgot to mention that my result was with plain 2.03,
where lstat() should not be found. So there is no discrepancy here.

Basically I wanted to know if configure had found lstat() and defined
HAVE_LSTAT. I wonder why djutils.c provides an implementation of lstat()
when HAVE_LSTAT is defined? Hmmm, I'll debug this before I release the
port.

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe
http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/

- Raw text -