| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Tue, 8 May 2001 10:51:44 -0400 |
| Message-Id: | <200105081451.KAA01411@envy.delorie.com> |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f |
| From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
| To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il |
| CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010508103514.3965P-100000@is> (message from Eli |
| Zaretskii on Tue, 8 May 2001 10:35:43 +0300 (IDT)) | |
| Subject: | Re: DJGPP 2.04 release date |
| References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010508103514 DOT 3965P-100000 AT is> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Is it really so important, given that W2K supports the LFN API? It would be nice to know what the story is. > > It would be nice if we could recommend something. The Zip Picker also > > doesn't have instructions specific to 2k or ME (Eli is working on ME, > > I think). > > W2K should be identical to NT, I think. (Which is not to say we > shouldn't improve the NT instructions ;-) Either way, we should have a 2k-specific entry, even if it does exactly what NT does. People don't always realize they should use the NT instructions for 2k, or the 98 instructions for ME.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |