Date:	Wed, 02 May 2001 19:55:13 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	lauras AT softhome DOT net
Message-Id:	<6480-Wed02May2001195513+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk,
	zippo-workers AT egroups DOT com, prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com
In-reply-to:	<20010502064226.A1122@lauras.lt>
Subject:	Re: DSMs and DJGPP packages
References:	<20010430181342 DOT A1130 AT lauras DOT lt> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010501114740 DOT 29799C-100000 AT is> <20010502064226 DOT A1122 AT lauras DOT lt>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 06:42:26 +0200
> 
> > (And Debian do too many contorted things in their distributions 
> > to serve as a good example, IMHO.)
> 
> Debian? Such as?

Try "emacs -q" and see how many packages and non-standard settings
does it load without your say-so.  Users then come back crying that
Emacs doesn't behave like the manual says, and they cannot find where
do all these changes come from.

They also have an incompatible install-info program, and their own way
of setting up the Info documents, which includes editing Info files
(so a user who upgrades some package not packaged by Debian will have
the whole Info system broken).

This goes on and on.  I think this is the wrong way of making things
work for the user.

- Raw text -