From:	"Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2001 06:42:26 +0200
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>,
	zippo-workers AT egroups DOT com, prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com
Subject:	Re: DSMs and DJGPP packages
Message-ID:	<20010502064226.A1122@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>,
	zippo-workers AT egroups DOT com, prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com
References:	<20010430181342 DOT A1130 AT lauras DOT lt> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010501114740 DOT 29799C-100000 AT is>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.15i
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010501114740.29799C-100000@is>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Tue, May 01, 2001 at 11:48:16AM +0300
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> But the package author calls it sh-utils, so I think we should respect 
> that.  

Yes. I didn't check it before posting.

> (And Debian do too many contorted things in their distributions 
> to serve as a good example, IMHO.)

Debian? Such as? (Plain curiousity; I don't intend to
start distro flame war.) 

Laurynas

- Raw text -