Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3AEC6FA0.5B18BF73@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2001 20:46:40 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, zippo-workers AT egroups DOT com,
	prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com
Subject:	Re: DSMs and DJGPP packages
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010429093712 DOT 26520D-100000 AT is> <3AEC4B18 DOT AC1B37C0 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <2110-Sun29Apr2001211811+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:10:48 +0100
> > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> >
> > BTW the DSMs for sh-utils 2.0 call it "Shell Utilities". Unfortunately
> > this will break upgrading from sh-utils 1.12, since that is called
> > "sh-utils" in the DSM. What is the correct name for sh-utils? Is it
> > sh-utils or shellutils or Shell Utilities?
> 
> The official name is "GNU Shell Utilities".

Thanks for the clarification.

The DSM specification says that a package name cannot contain spaces. So I
think we need to call the Shell Utilities package shellutils - in the same
way that fileutils is a contraction of File Utilities - or sh-utils. For
comparison, Redhat calls it 'sh-utils'.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe
http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/

- Raw text -