| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | "The Owl" <theowl AT freemail DOT c3 DOT hu> |
| To: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:05:30 +0200 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Subject: | Re: win2000/ntvdm/djgpp (fwd) |
| CC: | sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Message-ID: | <3AEC65FA.12111.13D9D556@localhost> |
| In-reply-to: | <6480-Wed25Apr2001233942+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
| References: | <3AE5877C DOT 29248 DOT 5DE2385 AT localhost> (theowl AT freemail DOT c3 DOT hu) |
| X-mailer: | Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> So could we please talk about this some more? Why do we need to issue > a PM interrupt, and why do we need to use the PM selector of our PSP? > Isn't __dpmi_int with the real-mode PSP segment good enough? _CurrentPSPSelector is set only when a pmode int was issued, a dpmi service 0300 or a real (v86) mode int will do nothing (for our purposes).
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |