From:	"Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2001 15:59:51 +0200
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc-3.0 related patches for DJGPP CVS version
Message-ID:	<20010429155951.A223@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20010429082104 DOT A543 AT lauras DOT lt> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010429095037 DOT 26520H-100000 AT is>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.15i
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010429095037.26520H-100000@is>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:07:39AM +0300
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Can you suggest the options that you think are the best?

Adding -malign-double -m128bit-long-double might help. But this
should be benchmarked or something.

> Should we ask the GCC maintainers for suggestions?

Maybe, if they would reply.

> Not necessarily: building a library could involve considerations which 
> don't apply to applications on a Joe Random User's machine.

I mean, if there are some switches which aren't enabled by default because
of ix86 ABI considerations on other platforms.

> > And there are a few new interesting options, like -m128bit-long-double.
> 
> In what version of GCC?  I cannot find it anywhere in the docs of GCC 
> 2.95.3.

3.0+

Laurynas

- Raw text -