From:	"Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2001 16:10:08 +0200
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc-3.0 related patches for DJGPP CVS version
Message-ID:	<20010429161008.A419@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>,
	Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEOICCAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010429154753 DOT 28788B-100000 AT is>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.15i
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010429154753.28788B-100000@is>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 03:49:26PM +0300
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > Don't the -march and or -mcpu switches affect alignment?
> 
> Yes, they do.  I'm afraid I don't get your point.

[...]

> Laurynas seems to say that he can suggest a better default than what 
> -mcpu implies.

Oops, ouch. Some clarifications: I don't have any silver bullet 
which makes everything run fast on every CPU. What I am saying
is that GCC provides defaults which fit into old i386 ABI. And some
requirements for new CPUs do not, so they are disabled by default.
That's why I am suggesting -m128bit-long-double, and that's it.

Laurynas

- Raw text -