From:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>, "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Subject:	Re: gcc-3.0 related patches for DJGPP CVS version
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2001 15:06:50 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIIEOICCAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010429154753.28788B-100000@is>
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > > > Of course in this case these switches should go into specs too.
> > > 
> > > Not necessarily: building a library could involve 
> considerations which 
> > > don't apply to applications on a Joe Random User's machine.
> > > 
> > Don't the -march and or -mcpu switches affect alignment?
> 
> Yes, they do.  I'm afraid I don't get your point.
My point was that if -mcpu and -march affect alignment, there should be
no need to explicitly specify it. And if Laurynas can indeed suggest a
better default, shouldn't _that_ be made the default then?

- Raw text -