From:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>, "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Cc:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject:	Re: gcc-3.0 related patches for DJGPP CVS version
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:07:29 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEOICCAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010429095037.26520H-100000@is>
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > Of course in this case these switches should go into specs too.
> 
> Not necessarily: building a library could involve considerations which 
> don't apply to applications on a Joe Random User's machine.
> 
Don't the -march and or -mcpu switches affect alignment? Seems to me that
the choice of what alignment is best is closely tied to the architecture
and/or CPU you're generating code for.
As such, it shouldn't be necessary to explicitly specify alignment unless
you have specific needs.

- Raw text -