Date:	Sat, 28 Apr 2001 09:30:00 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be
Message-Id:	<9003-Sat28Apr2001092959+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIGENNCCAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: Fileutils 4.0 beta 2
References:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIGENNCCAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 21:20:52 +0200
> 
> Guess I was wrong about the date; I last built zip a year ago; but the
> uppercase handling is in. I'm pretty sure it's part of the standard distro,
> though it _might_ be a local patch.  Will update my zip sources (there's
> probably a new version by now) and check this weekend.

No, you are probably right: I see that zip uses findfirst/findnext,
not readdir.  I guess Rich still uses an older version of zip (as do
I ;-).

> > However, I wonder: does this mean that none of the Binutils programs
> > will work with these stubs?  Will `nm' and `strings' fail, for
> > example?
> I believe so.  I know for a fact that gdb won't work with programs using
> nonstandard stubs.

This is bad, IMHO.  Doing exe2coff+stubify is not something I'd like
to tell users to do.

- Raw text -