Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2001 13:53:03 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Message-Id:	<2561-Fri27Apr2001135301+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<Pine.OSF.4.30.0104271214120.6876-100000@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
	(message from Esa A E Peuha on Fri, 27 Apr 2001 12:24:02 +0300 (EET
	DST))
Subject:	Re: sbrk() storing the size of memory blocks
References:	<Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 30 DOT 0104271214120 DOT 6876-100000 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 12:24:02 +0300 (EET DST)
> From: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
> >
> > Maybe because the diffs had DOS CR-LF EOLs.
> 
> Yes, that is probably why Pine encoded it in the first place, and
> there's nothing wrong with that.  However, I meant that it should
> have used quoted-printable instead of base64 as encoding method.

I think if attachments are encoded, they are always encoded with
base64.  Quoted-printable is used for non-ASCII 8-bit text in the
body.

With Pine, it's best to include the text in the body, with the Ctrl-R
command.  Pine automatically does TRT with end-of-line conversions.

- Raw text -