Message-Id:	<3.0.1.32.20010427134104.006d7d84@wingate>
X-Sender:	n_abing#ns DOT roxas-online DOT net DOT ph AT wingate
X-Mailer:	Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2001 13:41:04 +0800
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
From:	"Nimrod A. Abing" <n_abing AT ns DOT roxas-online DOT net DOT ph>
Subject:	Re: sbrk() storing the size of memory blocks
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10104261414430.592-200000@acp3bf>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hi!

At 02:30 PM 04/26/2001 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello, everyone.
>
>After all this discussion about how sbrk() makes life for the core dumping
>code unnecessarily hard by not storing the size of the memory blocks it
>got from DPMI, I decided to put on my hacker hat and do something about
>it.
>
>So, here is the set of patches needed to do this.

Could you please send another patch for crt0.S? I tried to apply it to the
crt0.S found DJLSR203 and it failed with the following messages:

~/pmdb/coredump>$patch -p0 < crt0.S.commenting.diff
patching file "crt0.S"
Hunk #1 succeeded at 24 with fuzz 2 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 146 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 311 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 347 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #9 FAILED at 408.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 412 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 467 (offset -13 lines).
Hunk #13 FAILED at 492.
2 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file "crt0.S.rej"

Thanks.

nimrod_a_abing
--------------

+========================================+
|  Home page: www.geocities.com/n_abing  |
+========================================+

"Tinimbang ka ngunit kulang."
If you understand that phrase, i-email mo'ko. ;-)

- Raw text -