delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200104041427.QAA12556@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> |
Subject: | Re: That crash message from the core dumper. |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Wed, 4 Apr 2001 16:27:46 +0200 (MET DST) |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010404161302.26435E-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Apr 04, 2001 04:18:05 PM |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.5 PL3] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Eli said: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Martin Stromberg wrote: > > > Shouldn't the limit on _dos_ds selector be 0x10ffef (or possibly > > 0x10fff0, I'm not sure if the limit includes the last address or not) > > instead of 0x0010ffff? > > (The limit is size minus 1.) > > No, 0x0010ffff is right. setup_core_selector (on crt1.c) says: > > __dpmi_set_segment_limit(_dos_ds, 0x10ffff); A misunderstanding. I'm not saying the dump in question is wrong, but that DOZE can only access up to 0x10ffef and that the _dos_ds selector limit should be set to this! Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |