Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:45:34 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
cc:	Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	RE: About release of gcc-2.95.3 for DJGPP
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.A41.4.05.10103212005120.135218-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010322094513.7564E-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> Anyway I think it's impossible to prevent all possibilities to
> do bad things. So we should stop at some reasonable place.

Yes, definitely.

> Perhaps we'll see other questions more often:
> 
> 	as using binutils earlier than 2.95 will most likely no more 
> 	supported with port of gcc-3.0, I made -mbnu210 the default
> 	and added emitting warning when -mno-bnu210 is used to remind 
> 	to upgrade binutils. 
> 
> Unfortunatelly as we know from earlier experience, many users don't read 
> readme files

I just stashed this bit away for the next FAQ release ;-)

- Raw text -