Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:31:41 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: zero fill the eof gap 2.1
In-Reply-To:	<3AB4C9B5.25069.91E3E5@localhost>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010319092840.21558F-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Mark E. wrote:

> > Maybe a better option would be to leave _DEV_CDEV out of this, and
> > instead provide a means to enable and disable the zero-fill on a
> > by-handle basis?
> 
> I think that's a good idea. I made changes to do just that.

Thanks; I'm happy now ;-)

- Raw text -