Date:	Sun, 18 Mar 2001 11:26:56 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Patch for djgpp.djl
In-Reply-To:	<3AB35C76.21437.248782@localhost>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010318112625.11615H-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Mark E. wrote:

> > To get gcc-3.0 20010314 working for DJGPP I had to modify djgpp.djl or
> > C++ applications which uses libstdcxx.a doesn't link correctly. Perhaps
> > it should not break anything with earlier versions ...  
> 
> I have no problem with the patch. Especially since it makes it more like the 
> binutils version.

Is there any chance these changes will have problems with previous
versions of GCC and/or Binutils?  If not, I think the changes can go
in.

> The patch adds handling of unique sections. Does this mean 
> that the g++ 3.0 compiler is producting unique sections without using flags 
> like '-ffunction-sections'?

Just for the record, could someone please say a few words about these
new sections, and the issue of unique sections in general?  Thanks.

- Raw text -