From:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Fetish.pm band-aid (Fileutils testsuite)
Date:	Wed, 14 Mar 2001 18:20:24 +0100
Message-ID:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIMEIPCBAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010314093335.22222C@is>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance:	Normal
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> I don't think it's wise to limit the search to %DJDIR%/bin.  We
> already look up the entire PATH in several other cases; we should do
> the same here, or else we will have another subtle incompatibility.
You're quite right.  I simply figured it would be a lot more likely
for that type of program to be in DJDIR/bin.  But then again, DJGPP
users could be using ActiveState's perl instead of the DJGPP one, so
we'd need to be able to find that on the path if given /usr/bin/perl.

- Raw text -