delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200103140802.JAA08808@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> |
Subject: | Re: zero fill the eof gap (complete patch) |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 101 09:02:36 +0100 (MET) |
In-Reply-To: | <3AAE5E4E.7854.1F00B2@localhost> from "Mark E." at Mar 13, 1 05:52:14 pm |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4 PL24] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> > > Why is it called "FILE_DESC_FILL_TEST" (the TEST part)? > > I called it that because the fill routine must test if the gap needs filling. > I'm not very happy with the name, but I've yet to come up with one that's > descriptive and short. If I can't, I'll just come up with one that's > descriptive. Ok. I think TEST gives the wrong idea, but I see the problem (finding a good name). It's "FILE_DESCRIPTOR_FILL_FILE_WITH_ZEROS_IF_SEEKING_BEYOND_END_OF_FILE" or something like that that we mean, right? I have no strong objections against the current name, but maybe "FILE_DESC_MAYBE_FILL" is better? Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |