| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com> |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2001 01:00:50 -0500 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Subject: | Re: exit handler for fd_props.c |
| Message-ID: | <3AAD7142.29241.6D9E9C@localhost> |
| In-reply-to: | <200103130520.AAA30074@envy.delorie.com> |
| References: | <3AAD63C1 DOT 14365 DOT 38DA4A AT localhost> (snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com) |
| X-mailer: | Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> > > This patch adds an exit handler for those fds that have a fd_properties > > struct associated with it. Problems or objections? > > Do you expect close() > to delete files that are marked for deletion? (which is what I assume) Yes. > And, if we're exiting anyway, do we really need to clean up so > carefully? It's not a bad thing, just wondering if you're expecting > something unexpected. If it's overkill, I can drop the cleanup. And if the whole patch is overkill, I have no problem with flushing it. Out, Mark
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |