delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:20:00 -0500 |
Message-Id: | <200103130520.AAA30074@envy.delorie.com> |
X-Authentication-Warning: | envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <3AAD63C1.14365.38DA4A@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com) |
Subject: | Re: exit handler for fd_props.c |
References: | <3AAD63C1 DOT 14365 DOT 38DA4A AT localhost> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> This patch adds an exit handler for those fds that have a fd_properties > struct associated with it. Problems or objections? All you're doing is closing fds, right? Why? Do you expect close() to delete files that are marked for deletion? (which is what I assume) And, if we're exiting anyway, do we really need to clean up so carefully? It's not a bad thing, just wondering if you're expecting something unexpected.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |