| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search | 
| Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:20:00 -0500 | 
| Message-Id: | <200103130520.AAA30074@envy.delorie.com> | 
| X-Authentication-Warning: | envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f | 
| From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> | 
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com | 
| In-reply-to: | <3AAD63C1.14365.38DA4A@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com) | 
| Subject: | Re: exit handler for fd_props.c | 
| References: | <3AAD63C1 DOT 14365 DOT 38DA4A AT localhost> | 
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com | 
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com | 
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com | 
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com | 
> This patch adds an exit handler for those fds that have a fd_properties > struct associated with it. Problems or objections? All you're doing is closing fds, right? Why? Do you expect close() to delete files that are marked for deletion? (which is what I assume) And, if we're exiting anyway, do we really need to clean up so carefully? It's not a bad thing, just wondering if you're expecting something unexpected.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy | 
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |