From:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: stubify and Windows ME
Date:	Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:50:48 +0100
Message-ID:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIEEHCCBAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010311155035.14999A-100000@is>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> However, if there's no reasonable way to run this in DOS, I don't think 
> you should bother testing it, as no user will ever be able to see that 
> code in action.  So just forget about it.
OK.

Oh, I noticed something annoying: running binaries (such as stubedit)
built in the DJGPP CVS tree crashed my system in a BIG way.  Turns out
this is because my gcc uses 'const' sections, and djgpp.djl doesn't put
them anywhere.  So if you would be so kind as to add these:

Index: lib/djgpp.djl
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/lib/djgpp.djl,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 lib/djgpp.djl
--- lib/djgpp.djl   2000/12/06 18:31:03     1.5
+++ lib/djgpp.djl   2001/03/11 14:49:29
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
   .text  0x1000+SIZEOF_HEADERS : {
     *(.text)
     *(.gnu.linkonce.t*)
+    *(.const*)
+    *(.ro*)
     *(.gnu.linkonce.r*)
     etext  =  . ;
     PROVIDE(_etext  =  .);
@@ -37,6 +39,14 @@
     end = . ;
     PROVIDE(_end = .);
     . = ALIGN(0x200);
+  }
+  .stab  0 (NOLOAD) :
+  {
+    [ .stab ]
+  }
+  .stabstr  0 (NOLOAD) :
+  {
+    [ .stabstr ]
   }
   /* DWARF 2 */
   .debug_aranges  0 : { *(.debug_aranges) }

- Raw text -