Date:	Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:47:14 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
cc:	djgpp workers list <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: strtol fix correct?
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10103011413530.8909-100000@acp3bf>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010301154229.7052A-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:

> > If someone cares enough, they are welcome to do that, now that we
> > don't have to rush into a long-overdue bug-fix release.
> 
> Well, I do care, so here's the diff I would propose. A test compile
> with my old GCC-2.8.1 cross-compiler on an Alpha/Tru64 box had no
> complaints.

Thanks.

But please compile with GCC 2.95.2 (it's more picky) as a native DJGPP 
compilation, and please run the Cygnus test suite ("make" in the 
tests/cygnus directory) after you rebuild the library.  The strto* 
functions took several iterations to get right, using this test suite as 
the testbed.  Since these functions are used by *scanf family, the test 
suite puts them under a very good scrutiny.

- Raw text -