Date:	Sun, 18 Feb 2001 22:29:02 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Message-Id:	<3791-Sun18Feb2001222902+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3A8FCC18.8337.2AB3C6@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com)
Subject:	Re: possible objcopy problem.
References:	<3A8CF9FC DOT 21062 DOT 9A92D AT localhost> (snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com) <3A8FCC18 DOT 8337 DOT 2AB3C6 AT localhost>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 13:20:24 -0500
> 
> The output arch. is set the input arch when copying. But since 'binary' 
> usually doesn't have an arch. for BFD to catch on to, a warning message is 
> output.

But doesn't coff-go32 identify the output architecture unambiguously?

- Raw text -