Date:	Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:12:28 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"Matthew Conte" <zeus AT nofrendo DOT org>
Message-Id:	<3405-Fri16Feb2001081227+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<000901c097cf$691ff3a0$8c971918@nycap.rr.com> (zeus@nofrendo.org)
Subject:	Re: possible objcopy problem.
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010215161352 DOT 29378A-100000 AT is> <000901c097cf$691ff3a0$8c971918 AT nycap DOT rr DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Matthew Conte" <zeus AT nofrendo DOT org>
> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:17:42 -0500
> 
> No, no I don't.  The first two bytes are not $014c, they are $0000.  That's
> a Bad Thing.  And what do you know, changing them to the correct COFF magic
> number makes everything work correctly.
> 
> This same problem also happens with sparC and elf32-i386.

Didn't you say that it worked for you on some ELF system?  I thought
it _was_ elf32-i386, no?

Anyway, this looks like a simple bug (or maybe misfeature) in
Binutils.  It should be a relatively simple matter to find in the
source of objcopy where does it fail to output the signature.  I will
try to look into that when I have time, unless someone else does it
sooner.

> Eli, do you have a "hotter" connection into binutils development that could
> raise interest about this bug?

No, I don't have any special relationship with them.  I'd imagine
that, if you told there the COFF signature is missing, that would be
specific enough to draw someone's attention.

- Raw text -