Date:	Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:03:13 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: namespace std and libstdc++ V3
In-Reply-To:	<20010214152545.933.qmail@lauras.lt>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010215130253.27892B-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> > Would it make sense to ask Stephen to continue sending changes for the
> > headers and commit them, and leave the issue of libstdc++ interaction
> > for later?  Backing up changes is easy with CVS, if we need to do that
> > later.
> 
> And why not to implement it once correctly (read: to be compatible with libc++)
> later?

I was under an impression that this was impossible, since the exact
details of the libstdc++'s implementation are not clear enough at this
time.

- Raw text -