Date:	Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:01:40 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Message-Id:	<2110-Mon12Feb2001210139+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<20010212160930.507.qmail@lauras.lt>
Subject:	Re: namespace std and libstdc++ V3
References:	<20010212160930 DOT 507 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:09:30 +0200
> 
> I'd like to point out that currently default libstdc++-v3 header
> strategy is c_std (C headers are included into default namespace), 
> not c_shadow.

Could you please explain the practical meaning of this?  Does it mean
that non-standard functions will be available in the global namespace?

> GCC and libstdc++ maintainers are different people, so far they've been
> helpful (althought always busy as well.). I seriously advise to ask in 
> libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org how this problem should be solved. 

It's a good idea to ask, but someone else should do that, not me.  It
is not appropriate IMHO for someone who knows almost nothing about the
issue in particular and C++ in general to ask such questions.

If someone does ask on libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, please CC this list.

- Raw text -