Message-ID:	<20010211081407.1641.qmail@lauras.lt>
From:	"Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date:	Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:14:07 +0200
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Solving Makefile.in.in SFN problem
Mail-Followup-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20010210155908 DOT 784 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIOEHECAAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIOEHECAAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>; from tim.van.holder@pandora.be on Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 09:25:34PM +0100
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> I really don't see the problem:
> 
> step 1) rename Makefile.in.in to Make-in
> step 2) Change configure.in to use
>         po/Makefile.in:po/Make-in instead of just
>         po/Makefile.in. Usually this will be in
>         AC_OUTPUT (or AC_CONFIG_FILES), although gcc
>         2.95.2 has it in a variable (all_outputs).
>         Then regenerate configure.
> step 3) Update Make-in to depend on Make-in, not
>         Makefile.in.in.

Wait, wait, a misunderstandment: I am doing exactly this.

Laurynas

- Raw text -