Message-ID:	<20010209055606.1415.qmail@lauras.lt>
From:	"Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date:	Fri, 9 Feb 2001 07:56:06 +0200
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: djunpack.bat
Mail-Followup-To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>,
	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20010208154453 DOT 263 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> <3405-Thu08Feb2001203313+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To:	<3405-Thu08Feb2001203313+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 08:33:14PM +0200
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 08:33:14PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I don't have any objections, but the question is: would GCC and GDB
> maintainers have objections?  Should we perhaps ask them before
> assuming this for the rest of the changes?

Well, in GCC this would be DJGPP specific file in a DJGPP-only
directory, so I think only DJGPP maintainer (DJ) will care.

> How about having a template in the CVS and a script that is run when
> the distro is tarred?  That script could then edit the template into
> the suitable form for each of the distributions, and use "gdb" for the
> GDB distribution, "gcc" for the GCC one.

Perhaps do-djunpack target in top level Makefile is suitable for this?

Laurynas

- Raw text -