Date:	Thu, 08 Feb 2001 20:33:14 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	lauras AT softhome DOT net
Message-Id:	<3405-Thu08Feb2001203313+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<20010208154453.263.qmail@lauras.lt>
Subject:	Re: djunpack.bat
References:	<20010208154453 DOT 263 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 17:44:53 +0200
> 
> 1) Location of fnchange.lst. Currently it is
>  %WHATEVER%/gdb/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst
> 
> Now if we want to have One True fnchange.lst, it should be
> moved somewhere else, like
>  %WHATEVER%/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst
> That's the easy part. Any objections?

I don't have any objections, but the question is: would GCC and GDB
maintainers have objections?  Should we perhaps ask them before
assuming this for the rest of the changes?

> 2) Getting rid of that %WHATEVER% above. It is pointing
> to the top level directory in distribution archive. Now 
> GDB-only djunpack.bat can set it to gdb-5.0, however unified 
> unpacker should deduce it at runtime. Any suggestions, how?

How about having a template in the CVS and a script that is run when
the distro is tarred?  That script could then edit the template into
the suitable form for each of the distributions, and use "gdb" for the
GDB distribution, "gcc" for the GCC one.

- Raw text -