delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:06:46 -0500 |
Message-Id: | <200102081906.OAA12046@envy.delorie.com> |
X-Authentication-Warning: | envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il |
CC: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <7458-Thu08Feb2001203557+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
Subject: | Re: stddef.h - namespace std patch |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010208161840 DOT 23371B-100000 AT is> <200102081545 DOT KAA10438 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <7458-Thu08Feb2001203557+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Right. So we should only worry about old GCC versions installed on > users' machines, if they upgrade djdev without upgrading GCC. Right. > Is it reasonable to tell that we recommend GCC 2.9x or later for > djdev204? Yes, I think that's reasonable, as long as it's as good as the older versions.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |