delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:36:36 -0500 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | Re: GCC: DJGPP bootstrap fix + define MSDOS |
Message-ID: | <3A8276B4.22740.2F391B@localhost> |
In-reply-to: | <3A82BDC5.12709.D7D88B@localhost> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010208102233 DOT 20284R-100000 AT is> |
X-mailer: | Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> It means that DJGPP port of gcc-3.0 will be no more usable with > binutils 2.8.* and 2.9.*. One will need to use 2.10 or above (really > bnu2951b.zip will also work) I agree with Andris that -mbnu210 can probably be removed even without the bootstrap failure forcing the issue. A gcc 3.0 binary built using binutils 2.10 won't work if you install it on a machine with binutils < 2.10. But a gcc 3.0 binary can still be built using binutils < 2.10 (or 2.951), it just won't be able to take advantage of weak symbols, etc. that makes the C++ problems with static data members go away. Two binaries could be distributed. One built using bnu 2.10 or later, and the other built using bnu 2.91, but that would probably confuse rather than help. Mark
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |