Date:	Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:20:53 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Stephen Silver <djgpp AT argentum DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
cc:	DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: wctype.h and STLport
In-Reply-To:	<002701c09131$61f2c8e0$9c11893e@oemcomputer>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010208102033.20284O-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Stephen Silver wrote:

> I'm trying out STLport with DJGPP, and I've found that the
> <cwctype> header causes errors.  It turns out that this is
> because DJGPP doesn't declare all the functions that are
> supposed to be declared in wctype.h.  Is there any objection
> to declaring these functions, even though DJGPP doesn't yet
> implement them?

I agree with DJ: this is not a good idea.  We actually had complaints
and FAQs about unimplemented functions whose prototypes were in the
headers.  We would like to avoid that.

- Raw text -