delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-Id: | <5.0.2.1.0.20010202202533.03ad6ec0@pop5.banet.net> |
X-Sender: | usbanet DOT farley3 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net |
X-Mailer: | QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 |
Date: | Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:32:14 -0500 |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
From: | "Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net> |
Subject: | Re: lfilelength doc change |
Cc: | "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <3A7ACD7F.17659.AE1F6A@localhost> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
At 03:08 PM 2/2/01 -0500, Mark E. wrote: >Hi guys, >After reading through the single Unix online docs and the LFS docs, >negative offsets >aren't considered valid. Therefore, I'd like to change 2^64 back to >2^63 and be done with it. OK by me, but then make it 2^63-1 instead of 2^64-2. 2^63-1 is the largest *positive* integer that will fit into a "long long", if I'm not forgetting my binary arithmetic. The "-2" in "2^64-2" was to exclude the equivalent of a signed return value of "-1" (which is, of course, unsigned 2^64-1). --------------------------------------------------------- Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org OR pjfarley AT banet DOT net)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |