delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200101311027.LAA06798@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> |
Subject: | Re: Binary rubbish |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:27:43 +0100 (MET) |
In-Reply-To: | <20010131100400.12798.qmail@lauras.lt> from "Laurynas Biveinis" at Jan 31, 2001 12:04:00 PM |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.5 PL3] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> But that ``binary rubish'' is a standard way to attach files > to emails. Maybe there is a newer ELM version than that one > you're using? I don't know, however if it existed it wouldn't be any good: I obviously want to comment on some of the text; why should I need to cut and paste from that other window/whatever? If the original poster put it in the message body, I'd have all the text at my hands to edit as I see fit. If people want feedback, they should make it easy to provide it. Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |