From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200101281342.OAA16994@father.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: djasm patch #3
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010128093947.17675P-100000@is> from Eli Zaretskii at "Jan 28, 2001 09:40:12 am"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 28 Jan 2001 14:42:34 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Eli Zaretskii:
> 
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, JT Williams wrote:
> 
> > Do these changes deserve explicit entries in wc20x.txi?
> 
> IMHO, yes.

I'd like some feedback on this as my English seems to be somewhat slow
today:

RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/docs/kb/wc204.txi,v
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -p -u -r1.42 wc204.txi
--- wc204.txi   2001/01/28 13:34:16     1.42
+++ wc204.txi   2001/01/28 13:40:24
@@ -233,3 +233,10 @@ that OS.
 The function @code{lfilelength} added with return type @code{long long}
 to support file sizes of up to @math{2^64-2}.

+@pindex djasm AT r{, ISO dates}
+The dates inserted into the object file by @code{djasm} now follows ISO
+format.
+
+@pindex djasm AT r{, new executable header offset}
+@code{djasm} now sets the offset of new executable field in the header
+of executables to zero (meaning not used).


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -