Date:	Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:11:48 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<1659-Fri19Jan2001121148+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<200101182036.VAA24158@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:36:25 +0100 (MET))
Subject:	Re: Fw: Patch for statfs.c
References:	<200101182036 DOT VAA24158 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 21:36:25 +0100 (MET)
> 
> According to Eli Zaretskii:
> > No one said that the Linux counts are the correct ones.  The CDs in
> > question are probably with Joliet extensions, which might make them
> > appear slightly differently to different OSes, because each filesystem
> > sees a somewhat different picture.
> 
> Possible. Linux detects Joliet extensions, though:
> 
> Jan 18 21:33:25 kant kernel: Max size:70652   Log zone size:2048
> Jan 18 21:33:25 kant kernel: First datazone:25   Root inode number 51200
> Jan 18 21:33:25 kant kernel: ISO9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 1
> 
> But we don't know if those are part of the Linux count anyway

Yes.  It might notice that Joliet extensions are there, but use
ISO9660 extensions to access the info, for example.

- Raw text -