Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3A64C0B1.DF1C9EEC@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:44:17 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.17 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: /dev/zero & /dev/full FSEXTs
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010116115713 DOT 1793L-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Richard Dawe wrote:
> > > > + #include <sys/xdevices.h>
> > >
> > > Is this header used on other platforms?
> >
> > No, it just seemed like a good name. It does not exist on Linux.
> 
> If other platforms have headers for these purposes, let's use the same
> names.  If no popular platform has a header for this, it's okay to use
> any name you fancy, including xdevices.h.

I checked SunOS 5.5.1 (aka Solaris 2.5.1) and Digital Unix 4.0. Neither of
them had sys/xdevices.h, so it doesn't look like the names will clash.
They both had headers for device data, but neither looked like valid
locations for __install_dev_{zero,full}().

So, sys/xdevices.h it is.

> > Thanks for the comments, Eli.
> 
> Thank _you_ for doing the work.

You're welcome!

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com> http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/ 

"The soul is the mirror of an indestructible universe."
--- Gottfried W. Leibniz

- Raw text -