delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be> |
To: | <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: Interest in Smalltalk and/or Python? |
Date: | Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:46:05 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <NEBBIOJNGMKPNOBKHCGHMEJJCAAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) |
In-Reply-To: | <8011-Sun14Jan2001203735+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
Importance: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id OAA29711 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> > Annoyance! As it turns out, the latest smalltalk package requires mmap(), > What does it use mmap for? Does it really want memory-mapped files, > or is that just for better memory allocation? Seems to be just memory allocation; it has a new source file (heap.c) that provides memory allocation. I've added some ifdef's to the only file using it; if HAVE_MMAP is 0, it uses the 'old' memory allocation from 1.7.0. I still need to test this though; let's hope both methods are compatible.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |