Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2001 19:53:35 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
Message-Id:	<3099-Sat13Jan2001195335+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<20010113105948.A6836@kendall.sfbr.org> (message from JT Williams
	on Sat, 13 Jan 2001 10:59:48 -0600)
Subject:	Re: djasm documentation patch 2/4
References:	<20010113091207 DOT B6763 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <200101131601 DOT RAA25162 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <20010113105948 DOT A6836 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 10:59:48 -0600
> From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
> 
> -: Well how limited is djasm's functionality really?
> 
> >From djasm.info:
> 
> What's missing from `djasm'?

IMHO these gotchas are not grave enough to label the assembler
``limited''.

How about "DJGPP-specific assembler" instead?

- Raw text -