X-Authentication-Warning:	kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2001 09:12:07 -0600
From:	JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: djasm documentation patch 2/4
Message-ID:	<20010113091207.B6763@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20010112143602 DOT B6051 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <200101122202 DOT RAA15516 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<200101122202.RAA15516@envy.delorie.com>; from dj@delorie.com on Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:02:55PM -0500
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

-: 
-: > + * djasm::       The DJGPP 16-bit assembler (limited functionality).
-: 
-: *I* wouldn't say it was "limited".

Well, I agree completely, but the impression I got while collating the
djasm information from the mail archives is that djasm exists *only* to
compile the stub, and that any other use is somehow `unofficial' or
`unsupported'.  The `limited functionality' is a poorly worded attempt
to convey this, but I am delighted to remove it and promote the use of
djasm as a stand-alone assembler.  Please advise.

- Raw text -