Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2001 09:34:23 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Message-Id:	<2110-Sat13Jan2001093422+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3A5F49FE.11625.45D878@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com)
Subject:	Re: Where does gcc -o foo make foo.exe
References:	<20010112223359 DOT 497 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> <3A5F49FE DOT 11625 DOT 45D878 AT localhost>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:16:30 -0500
> 
> Right. But DJGPP overrides LINK_COMMAND_SPEC in gcc's djgpp.h to use 
> djgpp.djl (which sets the target to coff-go32) and then call stubify on the 
> result. Any chance we can now finally agree to dispense with this?

Why would we want to dispense with that?

- Raw text -