Date:	Sat, 13 Jan 2001 09:23:34 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
Message-Id:	<9003-Sat13Jan2001092333+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<200101122255.RAA15943@envy.delorie.com> (message from DJ Delorie
	on Fri, 12 Jan 2001 17:55:30 -0500)
Subject:	Re: Where does gcc -o foo make foo.exe
References:	<20010112223359 DOT 497 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> <200101122255 DOT RAA15943 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 17:55:30 -0500
> From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
> 
> The stub format is the default output format for the linker.

Yes, but djgpp.djl overrides that, telling the linker to produce
coff-go32 instead of coff-go32-exe.

It's true that a stand-alone linker will make a stubified executable,
but I doubt if users want to bypass the linker script, because many
other things will break for them (if they want a DJGPP program).

- Raw text -