Date:	Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:09:47 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>,
	Juan Manuel Guerrero <ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>,
	ceo AT nbensacomputers DOT com
Subject:	Re: Fw: Patch for statfs.c
In-Reply-To:	<5.0.2.1.0.20010110233939.0275e8a0@pop5.banet.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010111100859.15305N@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Peter J. Farley III wrote:

>  >> Agreed, that seems to be the only way.  The problem is, I can't get 
> 
>  >any
>  >> of the versions I've tried so far to give the results that df from
>  >> fil316b.zip gives.  I will try building fil316s.zip with the stock
>  >> v2.03 libc.a and see what results I get from that.
>  >
>  >Yes, this seems like a good idea.
> 
> No luck.  I'm reasonably sure I did this in a pretty vanilla v2.03 
> setup, although with Mark E.'s most recent beta of bash in there.  The 
> libc and include headers were definitely stock versions.  I get the 
> same incorrect (well, different from fil316b.zip) results after 
> rebuilding with v2.03 code.
> 
> I'm stumped.

I think we need to ask Juan, who produced that binary.  Juan, could
you please tell whether you used stock v2.03 library to build
fil316b.zip?

Btw, Peter: you _do_ use the latest fil316b.zip from SimTel.NET, not
the original version I've put there some time in late 1997?

- Raw text -