delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-ID: | <000e01c079bc$acae71e0$2360893e@oemcomputer> |
From: | "Stephen Silver" <djgpp AT argentum DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
To: | <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: namespace std - stdio.h patch |
Date: | Mon, 8 Jan 2001 21:47:59 -0000 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
DJ Delorie wrote: > How do other platforms get around this? I haven't looked at other GCC ports (except MinGW, which currently makes no attempt to do it correctly). Borland C++ 5.5.1 uses essentially the same method as I've used (except that it has include guards like __STDIO_H_USING_LIST around the lists of using declarations). I think this is the obvious way to do it if all the real content must go in the <*.h> headers, as is the case with DJGPP. A C++ compiler that wasn't also a C compiler would put the using declarations in the <*.h> headers and everything else in the <c*> headers. Stephen
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |