Date:	Sun, 07 Jan 2001 20:43:01 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se
Message-Id:	<9743-Sun07Jan2001204301+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<200101071815.TAA24421@father.ludd.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on Sun, 7 Jan 2001 19:15:59 +0100 (MET))
Subject:	Re: df <-> df r:/
References:	<200101071815 DOT TAA24421 AT father DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 19:15:59 +0100 (MET)
> 
> Yes, it was a video disc. However, there are no differences between
> video and data discs on DVD. The only requirement is that a video DVD
> must contain the directory /video_ts which contains the data for the
> movie(s).

Does it mean that you can do a "DIR /S" on a video DVD and see all the
tracks as files and/or directories?  Can you also copy the tracks with
XCOPY and cp?

> One could argue that a disc with that directory is a video DVD, but
> that's an unnecessary limitation.

It's a limitation, but if it is only relevant to non-data disks,
perhaps it's not a grave limitation?  How many people would want to
use df to find the size of their video disks?

- Raw text -