Message-ID:	<3A532029.B50F24B1@softhome.net>
Date:	Wed, 03 Jan 2001 13:50:49 +0100
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Stability of new long arg passing code?
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010103133043 DOT 2342C-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Weird.
> 
> Is there any repeatable pattern in which options are reported as
> unrecognized?  E.g., is cc1.exe always the one which complains?  

No, sometimes ld.exe complains too. So it says that there is 
a bug in compiler driver, the gcc.exe. Because my ld.exe is
compiled before CMDLINE changes.

> Are the
> options it complains about the same options, or do they repeat
> themselves?  

It complains randomly, with no visible order.

> Do these options indeed belong to the program which
> complains, or, perhaps, cc1 gets options that belong to gcc?

A good question. Now I see that various programs involved in compilation
complain about options which they shouldn't get at all, like '-c' for cc1.exe,
'-W' for ld.exe and so on. So this is a GCC bug.

Thanks for help,
Laurynas

- Raw text -