Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2001/01/02/16:57:06
Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:
> > I don't agree. This is just a cleanup.
>
> It may *look* like one, but it may just as well be an essential piece to
> the DJGPP port of the program that just didn't get commented
> understandibly. IIRC, you can not build GCC with -g active. At least at
> the time of DJGPP 1.x, when DJ says this change was conceived, that was
> the case. You would hit the hard limit of 64K symbols in a COFF object
> file, otherwise. A debuggable GCC needs '-gstabs', instead.
GCC gets built with -g anyway nowadays. And yes, this is undebuggable.
It seems that CFLAGS setting in mh-djgpp gets overriden anyway. That's
why IMO it's a cleanup.
Laurynas
- Raw text -