Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2001/01/02/16:32:26
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > What do you want to remove?
>
> Either I'd like to clarify the comment or remove it and CFLAGS=-O2
> altogether.
>
> > But I won't recommend removing the CFLAGS=-O2 line: ``if it
> > ain't broke, don't fix it''.
>
> I don't agree. This is just a cleanup.
It may *look* like one, but it may just as well be an essential piece to
the DJGPP port of the program that just didn't get commented
understandibly. IIRC, you can not build GCC with -g active. At least at
the time of DJGPP 1.x, when DJ says this change was conceived, that was
the case. You would hit the hard limit of 64K symbols in a COFF object
file, otherwise. A debuggable GCC needs '-gstabs', instead.
--
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.
- Raw text -